A Soto WindMaster canister gas stove running just fine at over 10,500' (3200 m) in the Sierra Nevada in California. |
The myth got its start back in the early 1970's when canister gas stoves started seeing more wide spread use. The fuel used back then was 100% n-butane. N-butane is a lousy fuel for cold weather. Backpackers at high elevations encountered something that caused their canister gas stoves to work poorly: Cold. And thus the myth was born. The myth is kind of fact based. Kind of. I mean gas stoves were genuinely not working well at high elevation – but the elevation itself was not the problem. The problem was actually the cold, and the problem would have been just as bad or worse at sea level. Thus, a misinterpretation of real events lead to the myth. The real problem was cold, but people wrongly concluded that high elevation was to blame.
Modern Canisters
Now, you may be thinking: "Hikin' Jim, you big dummy, who cares why? It's still cold to this day at high elevation today, so my canister stove still isn't going to work."
Ah! Not so fast. Take a look at a modern backpacking canister. Typically printed on the side or top you'll see something about propane and isobutane in addition to "butane" (n-butane). Yes, back in the 1970's they only had n-butane in canisters. Now, they include propane and frequently isobutane, gasses that both have much better cold weather performance than n-butane alone.
A modern backpacking canister. Note that it contains not just plain butane (n-butane) but also isobutane and propane. |
Vaporization (Boiling) Point
n-butane -0.5°C 31°F
isobutane -12°C 11°F
propane -42°C -44°F
The vaporization points of the three gasses commonly used in canister gas.
The vaporization point of a gas blend lies somewhere in between the boiling points of the constituent gasses.
n-butane -0.5°C 31°F
isobutane -12°C 11°F
propane -42°C -44°F
The vaporization points of the three gasses commonly used in canister gas.
The vaporization point of a gas blend lies somewhere in between the boiling points of the constituent gasses.
If you are expecting cold weather, which brand of canister gas is the best to use? See: What's the best brand of gas for cold weather?
A canister gas stove running just fine at moderately high elevation, about 7200'/2200 m above sea level |
There are still things to consider when using a stove at high elevation, but these considerations apply to all stoves not just canister gas stoves.
The boiling point of water. As you climb, the boiling point of water decreases by almost 2 degrees Fahrenheit per 1000' of elevation gained (about 1 degree Celsius per 300 m). At sea level, water boils at 212 Fahrenheit/100 Celsius. At 10,000'/3300 m, the boiling point of water is 193 Fahrenheit/90 Celsius. Since the boiling point is lower, all else being equal, water boils faster at higher elevations.
Cooking time. Since the temperature of boiling water is lower at high elevation, it generally takes longer to cook something. Note that this doesn't really apply to frying etc. but only to those types of cooking that involve boiling water.
So, while it's faster to boil water at higher elevations, generally cooking takes longer, and you therefore may need more fuel when you cook at higher elevations. You can offset the need for more fuel by things like "cozy" cooking where you put your food in something insulative so the food will continue to cook even after you're done using your stove. You should also learn the Tips and Tricks of Good Stove Fuel Economy.
Piezoelectric ignitions. Piezo based ignition systems often struggle on hand held butane type lighters as low as 5,000'/1500 m elevation. Piezoelectric ignitions tend to work better on stoves than on lighters, but above 10,000'/3000 m elevation, one may still encounter problems. You should always bring alternative means to light a stove at any elevation, but it's even more important at elevations above 10,000'/3000 m. Some common alternative means of ignition include:
- A non-piezoelectric butane lighter. In other words, a common flint wheel type lighter such as a Bic brand lighter.
- Matches.
- A fire steel (ferro rod).
An MSR Reactor operating just fine at over 23,000'/7000 m elevation on Muztagh Ata (24636'/7509 m) in China. Photo credit: Reuben Brimfield. Used by permission. |
The "Proof of the Pudding"
If somehow you're not yet convinced that canister stoves not working at elevation is a myth, don't believe me; believe the mountaineers. What are more and more world class mountaineers using? Canister gas stoves. Note in the above photo that a canister gas stove is being used at over twenty three thousand feet in elevation. That's over 7,000 meters above sea level. This is far higher than most of us will ever climb. Mountaineers know their business. Mistakes in high elevation mountaineering are frequently fatal. Why do mountaineers use canister gas stoves? Because they work. Use by mountaineers tells us all we need to know about the myth of poor performance by canister stoves at high elevation. It's just that, a myth.
Thanks for joining me as I engage in a bit of "myth busting."
Happy stoving,
HJ
Not entirely true. The lighters on gas stoves are the same on butane lighters. And, no, they generally are not supposed to work over a mere 5,000-7,000 ft of elevation, which is about the elevation of Salt Lake City. They certainly are not deemed reliable above 10,000. However, I agree that it is an easy fix to bring an extra ARC lighter, but the argument is still missing the point.
ReplyDeleteThe main benefit of a gas stove isn't reliability, it is weight. For this reason, I think this article misses the point. The MAIN reason that "world class mountaineers" (whatever that means) use gas stoves is simple -- they are often climbing insanely high peaks in the "death zone" and you need to be as absolutely light as possible. That being said, there is no option for high elevation climbing than gas simply for the fact that you need to stay as light as possible.
However, gas stoves lose their luster for most hardcore outdoorsmen I know. You know, the guys who love to hike, climb, backpack, fish and or hunt, in the 5,000-15,000 feet range? For these guys, the arguments still apply. Gas stoves are not as reliable as, say, wood stoves like Biolite. They also are not as hot with unlimited fuel for survival situations. For most outdoorsman and backpackers, they are at high enough elevations to not have to worry about fickle nature of gas stoves, while still wanting the benefits of wood stoves.
Unless you are climbing the high Andes, Denali or the himalayas, I think most people would opt for a wood stove like Biolite.
The majority of backpackers use canister gas stoves according to every survey that I have seen. The next most common type of stove is alcohol. Wood stove use is less than 5% in the surveys I have seen.
DeleteWood stove use is frequently banned above 9500 to 10,000 feet, depending on location, due to the scarcity of wood at those elevations. In addition wood stoves are frequently banned due to fire danger.
The point of the article of course is that canister stoves work at high elevations which is important since canister stoves are the choice of the majority of backpackers.
HJ
Please tell us where you are finding wood for your wood stove above 10500'? Also please share what district you have unlimited biomass to burn at such altitudes. Does you local ranger know you're ripping up alpine vegitation? BTW my canister stove works great in the rain/snow/slush at altitude summer or winter all day. Canister stoves are a back up to building an actual fire due to conditions. A wood stove is just a fancy way for people to not arrange rocks. Obsolete imo.
DeleteThanks for writing this, it's very insightful. I was looking around for the cause of a "fail" with my Campingaz stove (luckily it was on a mild walk) and I think the cold (and the wind, and the canister being only half filled) explains it.
ReplyDeleteNext time I'll hug my canister and use some wind screen too. And in colder conditions I'll probably even use a different gas mixture. Thanks again. This is good stuff to be aware of.
I have a JetBoil. It works poorly above 6,000 feet. The MSR reactor was made for altitude, a friend of mine was one of the engineers who designed it. Biolite is a cool trinket of technology, but seriously...who is carrying that weight around?
ReplyDeleteIn your first photo. In the Sierra. You state you are at over 10.000 ft.
ReplyDeleteThe tree line in the Sierra Nevada is 8,500... Why is there trees and grass in the pic...B's...
Thanks for the info on stoves! It's good to know I won't starve on my next backpacking trip at 11k feet since I'm out of solid fuel for my solid fuel stove. Also to the comment on the tree line, 8.5K is complete bogus. Some people don't like doing their own research. The subalpine zone in the Sierra's, which is a zone that is below the treeline, can be found 8K-12K feet. That means you can still find trees at 10K feet and higher. It sounds like whoever posted that had never been at high elevation. As someone who's climbed Whitney and frequently ventured above 10K feet, there's definitely still trees above 10K feet.
DeleteThe type of gas makes very little difference, high altitude and cold weather they are very un reliable.
ReplyDeleteNo, not really. A great many Himalayan expeditions are using canister gas stoves without problems at elevations as high as anywhere on earth.
DeleteHJ